Christology

Paul seems to give the idea in other places that he had a Christology that Jesus was preexistence as divine.

The question of Christology formed the basis for Luther and Zwingli's fierce debate on the Lord's Supper.

A lot of orthodox Christology was set at least, at one of the main periods, at the Council of Nicaea.

In other words, we can map out all these differences, and of course, what was the Christology of the Gospel of John?

The beginning of the Gospel of John ends up having the Christology that now has become orthodox Christianity.

All those elements that would end up becoming orthodox Christianity, orthodox Christology, those can be found in the Gospel of John.

It could be whether he was human or divine, it could be whether he's a fish, any teaching about Jesus is a Christology.

We'll come back to this issue of what did people believe Jesus was and that's the doctrine of Christology.

Matthew's Christology is not too much different from Mark's.

Further, I criticise Agamben's focus on Christology, since this has a host of problems.

First look at Luke, of course Christology, as you recall, is what do you believe about Christ?

The Christology of the Gospel of Thomas though is that Jesus comes across as practically an already resurrected figure.

What is at issue in the Gospel of John is Christology.

What does Christology mean? Anybody?

So the suffering Son of God is part of Mark's Christology.

Do they disagree about Christology or is it now a purely a personnel leadership issue?

What Christology is, is what do you believe about the nature of Jesus Christ?

It's what is your theology of Jesus Christ, that's Christology and we've already seen different ones.

The impact of the Modem Revolution of Science on Christology