subelements

In contrast, a gnosis. xml. objectify node has no built-in method to step through all of its subelements.

Recursion means repetition in subelements, like the pattern of veins in a leaf.

Because all subelements are localized, it comes with the added benefit of being able to hide namespaces.

This finally gives us an accurate validation constraint for the attribute-or-subelements serialization form described above.

You can also just as easily turn the subelements into attributes of the row instead.

Secondly, it can't deal with XML mixed content, where both text and subelements appear in the body of an element, as in Listing 17.

The move to schema also allows a little shortcut, using attributes instead of subelements for property values.

The activity, the intent-filter, and action are specified with the activity element and subelements.

This change is described in Listing 9, where the subelements of are composed in one plain element (with no substructure).

Thirdly, it treats attributes and subelements identically.

If you want to use a DTD, subelements are strictly ordered, while attributes are unordered.

If the same type of data occurs many times within an object, subelements win, hands down.

This tip offers some guidance for when to use subelements and when to use attributes.

The data structures become complex elements with one or more subelements.

If there is a reasonable probability of multiple siblings in the future, use subelements from the start.

Identify the subelements and the order required in order to obtain more complicated XPath specifiers.

I have pointed to some cases where subelements or attributes are more desirable.

Some optional subelements, including a set of elements each mapped to a locale

activity, intent-filter, and action with the activity element and subelements

To save space, change all of the subelements to attributes