shared file system

To applications running on an NFS client, the shared file system appears as if it's local, native storage.

It's perfectly fair to criticize Apple for leaving out a USB port and a shared file system.

The server implements the shared file system and storage to which clients attach.

For the example cluster, the storage back end is a single entity, providing shared file system access across the cluster.

Before V7. 0. 1, WebSphere MQ did not support networked storage accessed as a shared file system.

For the shared file system, all the applications use the same location, so any file change is visible to the applications.

There can also be some considerable performance costs to using a shared file system, both on the master system and on the backup system.

The clients implement the user interface to the shared file system, mounted within the client's local file space.

The downside to this method is the shared file system must be maintained by you.

JmsConsumer. java is customized to read messages and then log information to a file on shared file system.

File Storage of message files in directories on a shared file system for reading by other databases.

Finally, you'll usually find a shared file system associated with clustering in an application server.

The shared file system and database cause a new single point of failure.

Another problem is that the speed of access to the shared file system is reduced.

First, mount a shared file system (such as NFS) or a SAN file system to both the primary and backup server machines.

There is a shared file system.

The solution is using a shared file system (for example, NFS) or a shared database.

Multiple servers with a shared file system

To work reliably with WebSphere MQ, a shared file system must provide

Configuring a shared file system using NFS

Set up NFS for a shared file system

Create the logs and qmgrs directory in the shared file system