inner classes

One of the advantages of using code blocks over a similar mechanism like anonymous inner classes lies in its conciseness.

There is nothing in the JavaBeans specification that requires you to create anonymous inner classes for event listening.

Even the Java language supports a limited form of nameless functions, with its anonymous inner classes.

Inner classes implement an interesting concept in Java programs that allows a whole class to be nested within another class.

The $1 is the Sun compiler's way of naming anonymous inner classes, incrementing the count for each class.

This includes publishing references to nonstatic inner classes, and generally precludes starting threads from within a constructor.

The scope of the relationships in a given instance of one of the inner classes is a single ACL.

But anonymous inner classes give you only a loose approximation of closures, and they don't go as far as you need to go.

Much of the main work of organizing a presentation of ACL relationships goes on in these inner classes.

Referring to enclosing type parameters inside static methods and static inner classes is prohibited outright by the compiler.

However, private members declared within a class can be accessed by inner classes.

While I could do something similar with Java code using anonymous inner classes, it's simply easier and less esoteric in Groovy.

The Java language provides inner classes, which can contain references to fields of their enclosing object.

This code uses an anonymous inner class, but you may also use named inner classes or independent classes as listeners.

As I probably mentioned before, you'll frequently see AsyncCallback classes defined as anonymous inner classes.

No more ugly anonymous inner classes: just use closures through those shortcut methods!

Scala is statically typed which allows it to provide generic classes, inner classes and even polymorphic methods.

because Outer itself is raw, so are all its inner classes, including Inner, and so it is not possible to pass any type parameters to it.

The recommended approach is to use static inner classes, if you must use an inner class at all.

The dearth of Java libraries that effectively use anonymous inner classes make this problem manifest.

Callback examples in most GWT books and online tutorials are implemented as anonymous inner classes.

You can easily debug the code inside callback classes because not all IDEs support tracing in the inner classes.

If an IDE generates the code for me, I'd probably just leave it instead of recoding the listeners as anonymous inner classes.

Accessing values from containing scopes using inner classes is slightly different than in Java.

Interfaces and inner classes provide more sophisticated ways to organize and control the objects in your system.

Another motivation is to reduce the verbosity of inner classes, which are currently the closest way to get this effect.

Primarily, you can use anonymous inner classes to implement closures.

Play also supports a callback model using Java anonymous inner classes.

Listing 9, the basis of a graphical clock, uses inner classes.

In every Wicket application source code you will find anonymous inner classes.

We could do this with inner classes, but they are so clunky to use that sometimes it seemed the cure was worse than the disease.

Merlin provides seven subclasses of DocFlavor as inner classes of itself to define formats.

Anonymous inner class are local inner classes that don't have a class name.

For Java programmers this is reminiscent of inner classes.

Because three of the . class files are really inner classes of Song. class and Songs. class, I only need to focus on two . class

more precisely , the action takes place within two inner classes : class

Consider Package Instead of Private Access with Private Inner Classes

anonymous inner classes are handy when you want to define callbacks on the fly

Inner classes in methods and scopes