happy path

This is often referred to as the "basic path" or "happy path. "

Happy path tests don't test the parts of the system most likely to fail (the sad paths).

Another happy path is replication of documents that have been updated on the source but not the destination.

start with the happy path , the basic course of action - but don t forget the alternate courses as well.

That's why it's important to have at least two happy path tests.

If mottos are more your style, feel free to mentally repeat yours as often as needed to keep you on your happy path.

Simplicity and consistency when users must take a detour to log in, enter a discount code, or otherwise deviate from the "happy path"

Like the happy path antipattern, the easy tests antipattern isn't about what is there but rather what isn't.

Happy path tests validate the expected behavior of the system under test.

now i go back and look at the other two scenarios , and try to merge them into the happy path activity diagram.

Don't just test the happy path; test boundary conditions and out-of-domain values.

The scenario I just described is the happy path. It deals with only new documents, without any conflicts.

Essentially one person's "happy path" is another person's nightmare.

In Figure 2, the basic flow, or happy path, goes straight through the diagram.

Usually, when you write code, you write it with the happy path in mind.

The antipattern is when the developer stops at happy path tests.

In the "happy path" scenario we are discussing, the RentalLocation replies "yes" (OK).

please never messed up real life and games . in games , we walk in our happy path , in real life , we walk stably step by step.

You may even mentally test it with some happy path data.

The first problem is that the "happy path" does not cross boundaries very well: the key barrier is the barrier of intention.

But how do you test the happy path case for push?