What is shameful is your exploitation of one citation that needed a minor correction, (even according to your own article), that is, using a date post-slavery versus slavery period, and turning it into an inciting hit-piece.

FORBES: Trying to Recover From Slavery Furor, Bachmann Repeats the Error

It alleged present-day companies and their predecessors, were "unjustly enriched through profits earned either directly or indirectly from the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and slavery between 1619 and 1865, as well as post-Emancipation slavery through the 1960s".

BBC: NEWS | Business | The vexed question of paying for slavery

But if they showed 10 minutes of it, you'd see all these different homage that are steeped in history that runs from slavery to reconstruction to post-Katrina in New Orleans.

NPR: Hot 8 Brass Band Play For A Living New Orleans