Seiffert and his team claim Darwinius didn't have much anatomical detail to study because it is so crushed, but none of the authors have ever seen the original specimen.

Neowin's Facebook page was removed several times for alleged infringement and it seems the only way to resolve the issue is to get the original complaintant to retract the claim.

In particular the original voodoo proposition - the claim that lower taxes mean higher revenue - is still very much there.